Steven S. and Lisa J. Bogue - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
          mechanics also subject to the seniority system.                             
               Mrs. Bogue, who was expecting the family’s second child in             
          2003, and petitioners’ young child remained in Farmington,                  
          Minnesota, at the family residence while Mr. Bogue worked in                
          Detroit, Washington, New York, and Milwaukee.  Mr. Bogue could              
          commute via air travel to Detroit and LaGuardia Airport in New              
          York and could occasionally drive to and from Milwaukee.  He                
          rented an apartment with other NWA mechanics in Milwaukee, stayed           
          in a friend’s trailer for part of the time he worked in New York,           
          and stayed in hotels occasionally as well.                                  
               Mr. Bogue had a cellular phone, and petitioners had America            
          Online (AOL) Internet service at their Minnesota residence during           
          2003.  Mr. Bogue claimed he purchased safety shoes and safety               
          glasses during 2003.                                                        
               Mr. Bogue wore a uniform while he worked for NWA.  His                 
          uniform would get covered in debris and chemicals as he worked,             
          and he needed to clean the uniform frequently.                              
               Petitioners claimed they contributed some items to charity             
          and made cash contributions in 2003.                                        
          Petitioners’ Return                                                         
               Petitioners claimed certain expenses on Schedule A, Itemized           
          Deductions, on the joint return for 2003.  Respondent examined              
          the return and issued petitioners a deficiency notice in which he           
          disallowed many of the expenses.  Of the expenses still in                  







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007