- 9 - supervisors. However, about two-thirds of the cost of the long distance calls was attributable to calls made to family members. e. Laundry, Dry Cleaning, Cost of Clothing, and Haircuts Petitioner seeks to deduct $3,604.65 as the combined cost of clothing purchases, laundry and dry cleaning, and haircuts. The clothing purchased consists of suits, sport coats, slacks, ties, socks, and alterations. These expenses were necessary for petitioner’s continued employment at The Men’s Warehouse because his dress code required him to wear a suit or a sport coat and slacks combination with a tie and to be well groomed. 5. Casualty Loss Petitioner claims that he suffered a $500 casualty loss in 2003 because he tore a business suit on a piece of glass while at work. 6. Tax Preparation Software and Publications On the proposed Form 1040, petitioner claims a $166.49 deduction for tax preparation software and publications. OPINION I. Dependency Exemption Deduction for Petitioner’s Daughter A taxpayer bears the burden of proving that the Commissioner’s determinations set forth in the notice of deficiency are incorrect. Rule 142(a)(1); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). Tax deductions are a matter of legislative grace, and a taxpayer has the burden of proving thatPage: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007