Michael Kevin Boltinghouse - Page 13




                                       - 13 -                                         
          incurred $4,162 of medical and dental expenses in 2003 before               
          subtracting 7.5 percent of his AGI ($3,366).                                
               Respondent concedes that petitioner is entitled to a                   
          deduction for medical and dental insurance premiums paid, $26.92            
          for physician visits, $156.59 for medications, and certain                  
          transportation expenses, leaving $446.01 for physician visits,              
          $48.50 for medications, and $14.96 for contour replacement grips.           
          Petitioner offered no evidence to substantiate $187.02 of the               
          amount claimed on the Schedule A; thus he is not entitled to a              
          deduction for that amount.                                                  
               As evidence of the disputed expenses, petitioner provided              
          three Explanation of Benefits statements showing that he made               
          copayments totaling $65 for physician visits, two statements that           
          he owed a total of $401.01 for physician visits, two receipts               
          that he paid $48.50 for vitamins, and one receipt that he paid              
          $14.96 for two contour replacement grips.                                   
               Respondent appears to have misread the Explanation of                  
          Benefits statements that petitioner provided regarding three of             
          the physician visits, which clearly indicate that petitioner made           
          copayments totaling $65 during those visits (however, petitioner            
          may be liable for an additional $65, which petitioner is not                
          claiming), and therefore petitioner has met his burden regarding            
          that amount.  However, respondent correctly points out that as to           
          the two statements indicating that petitioner owed a total of               







Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007