Larry Bruce - Page 14




                                       - 14 -                                         
          May 11, 12, or 13.  Thus, the date the lien notice was prepared             
          and signed has no significance and does not bear on whether there           
          was an abuse of discretion in this case.                                    
               Based upon the record before us, we have determined that               
          there is no genuine issue of material fact.  We hold that the               
          settlement officer’s determination sustaining the Notice of                 
          Federal Tax Lien filing was not an abuse of discretion.  We                 
          therefore shall grant respondent’s motion for summary judgment.             
               We have considered all of the parties’ contentions and                 
          arguments that are not discussed herein, and we find them to be             
          without merit, irrelevant, and/or moot.                                     

                                             An appropriate order and                 
                                        decision will be entered for                  
                                        respondent.                                   


                                                                                     



















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14

Last modified: November 10, 2007