William J. Brumback - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
               On June 28, 2005, respondent issued a Notice of                        
          Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) Under Section 6320            
          and/or 6330 to petitioner regarding his 2001 tax year.  In the              
          notice of determination, respondent determined to sustain the               
          collection action.                                                          
               On July 25, 2005, petitioner timely filed a petition                   
          regarding the notice of determination.  The petition contains               
          frivolous and groundless arguments.                                         
               On January 31, 2006, in response to petitioner’s lengthy and           
          frivolous discovery requests, respondent sent petitioner a letter           
          providing him excerpts from “The Truth About Frivolous Tax                  
          Arguments”.                                                                 
               On July 5, 2006, respondent sent petitioner a letter that              
          noted that petitioner’s continuing discovery requests were                  
          frivolous and groundless, and it appeared that their only purpose           
          was for delay.  Petitioner was advised of the provisions of                 
          section 6673 and that respondent would file a motion requesting             
          sanctions under section 6673.                                               
               On July 19, 2006, respondent sent petitioner another letter.           
          Attached were copies of his Form 4340, Certificate of                       
          Assessments, Payments, and Other Specified Matters, for 2001; a             
          summary record of assessments for 2001; and “The Truth About                
          Frivolous Tax Arguments”.  Respondent directed petitioner’s                 








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007