Jody Schoolcraft-Burkey - Page 17




                                      - 16 -                                          
        1.274-5T(c)(2)(i), Temporary Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46017             
        (Nov. 6, 1985).                                                               
             Petitioner submitted a travel log consisting of 12 pages, one            
        for each month of 2003.  The purpose for the claimed travel                   
        expense is indicated on every page as “Travel from Niles to                   
        Steubenville and return” or “Travel from Niles to                             
        Steubenville/Lisbon et al and return”.  The description of the                
        travel is shown on every page as “Client calls at                             
        Chamber/Commerce” and/or “Client calls at One Stop Center”.                   
        Actual travel on specific days is not shown; rather, monthly                  
        totals are given.  Specific client names are not provided (or                 
        itemized with identifying information redacted).  The nature of               
        the business discussions petitioner conducted is not shown.  We               
        are unable to conclude from petitioner’s travel log that the                  
        strict substantiation requirements of section 274 have been met.              
        Accordingly, the claimed mileage/travel expenses are not                      
        deductible.                                                                   
             At trial, petitioner claimed that he is entitled to a                    
        deduction for “lost medical insurance coverage”.  Petitioner                  
        testified that during 2003 he did not have insurance coverage and             
        did not pay any amounts for medical insurance.  His claimed                   
        deduction is based on amounts he estimated that he would have paid            
        if he had purchased such insurance.  Because petitioner did not               
        pay this expense, he is not entitled to this deduction.                       







Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007