- 3 - initiation, investigation, and prosecution of the whistle-blower case. According to Proulx, petitioner had failed to pay him what he was due pursuant to the contract between them.1 As a result of the lawsuit, in October 1998 Proulx was awarded a $231,463 judgment against petitioner. In accordance with California law, following the judgment Proulx initiated proceedings that gave rise to a lien on petitioner’s nonexempt personal property, including, as it turned out, the proceeds from the reward. Aware that the fourth installment of the reward was soon due and potentially subject to the above-referenced lien, on January 25, 1999, petitioner initiated a voluntary chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California (the first bankruptcy proceeding). On February 2, 1999, Proulx filed an Ex Parte Application for Order to Pay Trustee (the ex parte application) in the first bankruptcy proceeding seeking an order from the bankruptcy court authorizing the U.S. Government to pay the chapter 13 trustee the final reward installment due petitioner from the whistle-blower case. 1 The terms of the contract are unclear but apparently involved a contingency fee based upon petitioner’s recovery. If the contract was reduced to writing, the document was not made part of the record in either the lawsuit or this proceeding.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007