- 9 - Court’s test in Commissioner v. Schleier, supra at 337, we need not decide whether the underlying claim giving rise to the award, i.e., OTS’s violation of the RIF regulations in effecting Mrs. Campbell’s demotion, involved tort or tort type rights.6 In deciding whether damages were received “on account of personal injuries or sickness”, the Supreme Court has construed section 104(a)(2) to require that a damage award be more than 6 For the sake of completeness, we note that petitioners’ contention that, under the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. Burke, 504 U.S. 229 (1992), a taxpayer need prove only that the claim underlying a damage award was based on “tort or tort type rights” for the award to be excludable under pre-1996 sec. 104(a)(2), was expressly rejected by the Supreme Court in Commissioner v. Schleier, 515 U.S. 323, 336 (1995): Second, and more importantly, the holding of Burke is narrower than * * * [the taxpayer] suggests. In Burke, following the framework established in the Internal Revenue Service regulations, we noted that § 104(a)(2) requires a determination whether the underlying action is “based upon tort or tort type rights.” * * * In so doing, however, we did not hold that the inquiry into “tort or tort type rights” constituted the beginning and end of the analysis. In particular, though Burke relied on Title VII’s failure to qualify as an action based upon tort type rights, we did not intend to eliminate the basic requirement found in both the statute and the regulation that only amounts received “on account of personal injuries or sickness” come within § 104(a)(2)’s exclusion. Thus, though satisfaction of Burke’s “tort or tort type” inquiry is a necessary condition for excludability under § 104(a)(2), it is not a sufficient condition. [Fn. ref. omitted.] Thus, contrary to petitioners’ argument, both elements of the Schleier test must be satisfied in order for the sec. 104(a)(2) exclusion to apply. Commissioner v. Schleier, supra at 337; United States v. Burke, supra at 233.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007