Hubert W.N. Chang - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
          that the assessments in question were valid inasmuch as                     
          respondent failed to produce Forms 23 C, Assessment Certificate             
          -- Summary Record of Assessments, for each year at issue.                   
               Although Federal tax assessments are formally recorded on              
          Form 23 C, this Court has held that Forms 4340, Certificate of              
          Assessments, Payments, and Other Specified Matters, are                     
          presumptive evidence on which respondent’s Appeals Office may               
          rely to verify that an assessment has been made against a person            
          for purposes of sections 6320 and 6330.  Davis v. Commissioner,             
          115 T.C. 35, 40-41 (2000).  Where the taxpayer is provided with             
          Forms 4340 after the hearing and before trial, and the taxpayer             
          does not show any irregularity in the assessment procedure that             
          would raise a question about the validity of the assessments, the           
          taxpayer is not prejudiced.  See Nestor v. Commissioner, 118 T.C.           
          162, 167 (2002).                                                            
               In this case, respondent provided to petitioner and this               
          Court Forms 4340 for each year at issue reflecting the assessment           
          of each tax liability.  This Court finds that the Forms 4340                
          respondent prepared with respect to petitioner’s tax liabilities            
          for the years at issue establish respondent properly assessed               
          those liabilities and that those liabilities remain unpaid.                 
          Petitioner has not shown any irregularity in respondent’s                   
          assessment procedures that raises a question about the validity             
          of respondent’s assessments of those tax liabilities.                       







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007