Brad Daniel Clarke, Sr. - Page 12



                                       - 11 -                                         
          made the overpayment” and, subject to certain limitations, to               
          refund any balance to the person.  In lieu of a refund, a                   
          taxpayer can instruct the IRS to credit his overpayment against             
          the estimated tax for the taxable year immediately succeeding the           
          year of the overpayment.  Sec. 301.6402-3(a)(5), Proced. & Admin.           
          Regs.                                                                       
               It is well settled that the IRS need only refund, or apply             
          to the taxpayer’s estimated tax, that portion of the overpayment            
          that exceeds the taxpayer’s “outstanding liability for any tax”.            
          Sec. 301.6402-3(a)(6)(i), Proced. & Admin. Regs.; see N. States             
          Power Co. v. United States, 73 F.3d 764, 767 (8th Cir. 1996)                
          (quoting United States v. Ryan, 64 F.3d 1516, 1523 (11th Cir.               
          1995) (“[Section 6402], ‘plainly gives the IRS the discretion to            
          apply overpayments to any tax liability’”)); Kalb v. United                 
          States, 505 F.2d 506, 509 (2d Cir. 1974) (rejecting the argument            
          that because the tax overpayment was voluntary, the IRS was bound           
          to comply with the taxpayer’s direction about how to apply that             
          payment; section 6402(a) “clearly gives the IRS discretion to               
          apply a refund to ‘any liability’ of the taxpayer”).                        
               The difficulty in this case is that it was never established           
          that petitioner owed any tax for 2004.  Petitioner repeatedly               
          brought to respondent’s attention that he did not believe that he           
          owed tax for 2004.  On the contrary, petitioner believed that he            
          was entitled to a refund of $243.20, and thus it was                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007