Timothy L. Clouse - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
               On July 12, 2002, respondent issued to petitioner a notice             
          of determination.  On August 13, 2002, petitioner submitted a               
          timely petition containing frivolous arguments to this Court.               
                                     Discussion                                       
               Summary judgment is intended to expedite litigation and                
          avoid unnecessary and expensive trials and may be granted where             
          there is no genuine issue of material fact and a decision may be            
          rendered as a matter of law.  Rule 121(a) and (b); Fla. Peach               
          Corp. v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 678, 681 (1988).  The moving party           
          bears the burden of proving that there is no genuine issue of               
          material fact, and factual inferences are viewed in a light most            
          favorable to the nonmoving party.  Craig v. Commissioner, 119               
          T.C. 252, 260 (2002); Dahlstrom v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 812, 821           
          (1985).  The party opposing summary judgment must set forth                 
          specific facts that show that a genuine question of material fact           
          exists and may not rely merely on allegations or denials in the             
          pleadings.  Grant Creek Water Works, Ltd. v. Commissioner, 91               
          T.C. 322, 325 (1988); Casanova Co. v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 214,            
          217 (1986).                                                                 
               Section 6330 provides that no levy may be made on any                  
          property or right to property of a person unless the Secretary              
          first notifies him or her in writing of the right to a hearing              
          before the Appeals Office.  The Appeals officer must verify at              








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007