- 6 - cases premised on arguments akin to those raised herein summarily and with imposition of the section 6673 penalty.3 See, e.g., Craig v. Commissioner, supra at 264-265 (and cases cited thereat). Respondent has not sought a section 6673 penalty in the instant case; however, the Court considers the issue sua sponte. Although we do not impose a penalty on petitioner, we take this opportunity to admonish petitioner that the Court will consider imposing such a penalty should he return to the Court in the future in an attempt to delay collection or advance frivolous or groundless arguments. To reflect the foregoing, An appropriate order and decision will be entered. 3We note that on Dec. 20, 2006, Congress enacted the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, Pub. L. 109-432, div. A, sec. 407, 120 Stat. 2960, which, through amendments to secs. 6702 and 6330, instructs the Secretary to prescribe a list of positions identified as frivolous. A request for a sec. 6330 hearing based on any such position may then be disregarded and is not subject to further administrative or judicial review. The new provisions are effective only for issues raised after the Secretary prescribes the list of frivolous positions.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6Last modified: November 10, 2007