Gary Lee Colvin - Page 23




                                       - 23 -                                         
          independent contractor status.  Id. at 271 (citing Breaux &                 
          Daigle, Inc. v. United States, 900 F.2d at 53).  Additionally,              
          maintenance of a home office is consistent with independent                 
          contractor status, although alone it does not constitute                    
          sufficient basis for a finding of independent contractor status.            
          Lewis v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-635.                                 
               Petitioner owned two vehicles and claimed he utilized both             
          for work purposes for 2000, although the extent of such use is              
          disputed.  The employment agreement provided that petitioner was            
          to maintain motor vehicle insurance at all times and that all               
          other related expenses were his responsibility.  The record                 
          reflects that petitioner worked at least part-time from home.               
          Petitioner claimed as a Schedule C deduction $3,191 for business            
          use of his home, which respondent allowed.  Accordingly, the                
          Court concludes that this factor tends to weigh in favor of                 
          independent contractor status.                                              
                    3. Opportunity for Profit or Loss                                 
               Compensation on a commission basis is entirely consistent              
          with an employer-employee relationship.  Tex. Carbonate Co. v.              
          Phinney, 307 F.2d 289, 292 (5th Cir. 1962); Capital Life & Health           
          Ins. Co. v. Bowers, 186 F.2d 943, 944-945 (4th Cir. 1951).  While           
          petitioner could have conceivably suffered some loss as a result            
          of his sales activity for TIG, he may still be an employee under            
          the common law test if his risk of loss was negligible.  See                







Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007