- 25 - that TIG performed computer training and installed networking cable and telephone systems. As a result, petitioner argues that he “was not a key connection with customers, only one of many resources available to them”, and was therefore not an integral part of TIG’s business. However, the fact that TIG had several separate divisions does not affect the analysis of whether petitioner’s services were integral to TIG. Petitioner’s services could have been integral to the division in which he worked, which would indicate that petitioner was an employee. See Ewens & Miller, Inc., v. Commissioner, 117 T.C. at 272-273. Respondent was silent on the issue. The Court concludes that this factor is neutral and indicates neither independent contractor status nor employee status. 6. Permanency of the Relationship A transitory work relationship may weigh in favor of independent contractor status. Ewens & Miller, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra at 273 (citing Herman v. Express Sixty- Minutes Delivery Serv., Inc., 161 F.3d 299, 305 (5th Cir. 1998)). The principal’s right to discharge the worker, and the worker’s right to quit, at any time, is an important factor. Id. Petitioner’s position at TIG was for renewable 1-year terms. It was also at will and terminable by either party at any time, with or without cause or notice, and petitioner was in fact terminated. The Court concludes that petitioner’s position wasPage: Previous 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007