Gary Lee Colvin - Page 33




                                       - 33 -                                         
          the substantiation requirements of section 274 to establish his             
          automobile mileage.  Accordingly, petitioner is allowed a                   
          miscellaneous itemized Schedule A deduction in the amount of                
          $780, subject to the overall 2-percent of adjusted gross income             
          limitation.                                                                 
               D. Loan Interest                                                       
               Pursuant to section 163(a), interest is deductible.                    
          However, personal interest generally is not deductible.                     
          Sec. 163(h).  Debt arrangements between family members are                  
          subject to a high level of scrutiny.  Zohoury v. Commissioner,              
          T.C. Memo. 1983-597.  The following factors are used to                     
          scrutinize intrafamily loans: (1) Whether a specific rate of                
          interest is charged to the taxpayer for the use of the money;               
          (2) whether there is a specific date for repayment; (3) whether             
          there is a written instrument evidencing the debt; (4) whether              
          there is a legitimate purpose for obtaining the loan; (5) whether           
          the taxpayer intended to repay the debt; (6) whether the relative           
          receiving the payments on the loan was impecunious; and                     
          (7) whether the loan has economic substance.  Id.                           




               19(...continued)                                                       
          Petitioner’s 18,200 claimed business miles multiplied by the                
          business standard mileage rate of 32.5 cents totals $5,915.  See            
          id. secs. 5.01 and 5.02, 1999-2 C.B. at 526-527.  The Court                 
          concludes that petitioner’s calculations do not comply with Rev.            
          Proc. 99-38, 1999-2 C.B. 525.                                               






Page:  Previous  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007