Richard M. Downing - Page 34



                                        - 34 -                                        
          proposed levy upon his property.15  Nevertheless, as previously             
          discussed, we have held that the final notice of                            
          intent to levy, issued April 22, 2003, was invalid because                  
          respondent did not send it to petitioner’s last known address.16            
          D.   Conclusion                                                             
               Respondent’s final determination sustaining the filing of              
          the notice of Federal tax lien is not sustained insofar as it               
          relates to petitioner’s 1995 tax year.                                      





               15 Petitioner’s original petition, filed Apr. 5, 2005,                 
          broadly challenges respondent’s assessment of his 1995 income tax           
          and respondent’s accounting for his payments on his 1995 and 1999           
          account but does not expressly mention either the notice of                 
          determination regarding the Federal tax lien or the decision                
          letter with respect to the levy.  The petition as originally                
          filed makes no express reference to sec. 6320 or 6330 or any                
          other statutory basis for this Court’s jurisdiction.  Contrary to           
          Rule 331(b)(8), the petition as originally filed includes no copy           
          of the notice of determination.  At the commencement of the                 
          trial, petitioner amended his petition to assert that he had                
          requested IRS Appeals Office consideration “in response to a                
          Notice of Federal Tax lien Filing and Your Right to a Hearing               
          Under IRS 6320 regarding alleged liabilities for 1995 and 1999”,            
          and that on Mar. 8, 2005, respondent had issued the notice of               
          determination concerning the filing of the Federal tax lien.                
          Attached to the petition thus amended is a copy of said notice of           
          determination.  In his opening brief and reply brief, petitioner            
          states identically:  “This Tax Court proceeding is an appeal from           
          a CDP Hearing that Petitioner requested in response to a Notice             
          of Federal Tax Lien Filing issued by Respondent for an alleged              
          1995 income tax assessment.”                                                
               16 If petitioner had properly placed in issue any challenge            
          to the equivalent hearing decision letter, our holding as to the            
          invalidity of the final notice of intent to levy would have been            
          relevant in deciding the proper basis for dismissal of this                 
          issue.  See Kennedy v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 255, 260-261                  
          (2001); Buffano v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2007-32.                        




Page:  Previous  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007