Christine Ann Elliott - Page 4




                                        - 3 -                                         
          year 2001, petitioner and Mr. Elliott agreed that petitioner                
          would request an early IRA distribution.  Mr. Elliott filled out            
          at least two forms requesting early distributions from                      
          petitioner’s IRA.  The forms indicated that petitioner elected to           
          not have Federal income tax withheld from the gross distribution            
          amount requested.  Petitioner signed all of the forms requesting            
          early distributions from her IRA and during tax year 2001                   
          received distributions totaling $25,249.  Resources Trust Company           
          directly deposited the early IRA distributions into a bank                  
          account jointly held by petitioner and Mr. Elliott.  Petitioner             
          and Mr. Elliott filed a joint Federal income tax return for tax             
          year 2001 but did not report the early distributions from                   
          petitioner’s IRA.1  Petitioner and Mr. Elliott filed for divorce            
          in May 2003, but at the time of trial, the divorce was not yet              
          final.                                                                      
               Although an Internal Revenue Service Form 8857, Request for            
          Innocent Spouse Relief, was not made a part of the record,                  
          respondent does not deny that petitioner submitted a request for            
          relief.  On October 21, 2005, respondent issued a Notice of                 
          Determination denying petitioner’s request for relief under                 
          section 6015(b), (c), and (f).  On January 9, 2006, petitioner              



               1 There is no indication in the record whether a Notice of             
          Deficiency was issued, but petitioner does not contest the amount           
          of tax due or that it was properly assessed.                                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007