Royce A. Ellis - Page 16




                                       - 16 -                                         
               Petitioner did not keep contemporaneous books and records of           
          his costs of goods sold or business deductions for the years at             
          issue and did not testify at the trial.  At trial, petitioner               
          offered no evidence to substantiate the reported 1999 Schedule C            
          costs of goods sold or deductions and did not claim or                      
          substantiate that petitioner had any Schedule C costs of goods              
          sold or deductions for 2000.                                                
               To substantiate petitioner’s 2001 Schedule C costs of goods            
          sold and deductions, petitioner merely produced the 2001 business           
          ledger prepared for the audit with Agent Bok without any                    
          supporting documentation, except for 18 Forms 1099-MISC reporting           
          compensation paid to contract employees who performed services              
          for petitioner in 2001.  However, 8 of the 18 Forms 1099-MISC did           
          not contain the Social Security numbers of the contract employees           
          reported as receiving compensation, two sets of the Forms 1099-             
          MISC contained the same Social Security number for different                
          names, and 7 of the Forms 1099-MISC did not contain addresses.              
          The 18 Forms 1099-MISC were not filed with the IRS, and the                 
          contract employees indicated on the Forms 1099-MISC as receiving            
          compensation were not listed as taxpayers in respondent’s                   
          database.                                                                   
               The Court was not provided with any information about                  
          petitioner’s business operation or how expenses were incurred.              
          As a result, the Court did not have a reasonable basis upon which           







Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007