Geoff Eyler & Audrey Eyler - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
               In support of their position that the $5,066 for “Employee             
          benefit programs” claimed in petitioners’ 2001 Schedule C is                
          deductible under section 162(a), petitioners maintain that in               
          2001 Mr. Eyler paid pursuant to the unwritten health plan the               
          premiums for Mr. Eyler’s Wellmark health policy and that such               
          premiums are excludable from Ms. Eyler’s income under sections              
          105(b) and/or 106(a).10  As a result, according to petitioners,             
          the health insurance premiums at issue are deductible under                 
          section 162(a) by Mr. Eyler as ordinary and necessary business              
          expenses of his tiling business.  On the record before us, we               
          reject petitioners’ argument.                                               
               Section 105(b) on which petitioners rely provides in perti-            
          nent part:                                                                  


               9(...continued)                                                        
                    the taxpayer, his spouse, and dependents.                         
                         (B) Applicable percentage.–-For purposes of                  
                    subparagraph (A), the applicable percentage shall                 
                    be determined under the following table:                          
                    For taxable years beginning   The applicable                      
                    in calendar year--            percentage is--                     
                    1999 through 2001 . .. . . . . . . .60                            
               The legislative history under sec. 162(l) establishes that             
          that statute was enacted “to reduce the disparity between the tax           
          treatment of owners of incorporated and unincorporated busi-                
          nesses.”  S. Rept. 104-16, at 11 (1995); see also H. Rept. 104-             
          32, at 7-8 (1995).                                                          
               10Although petitioners rely on secs. 105(b) and 106(a) in              
          petitioners’ opening brief, they rely only on sec. 105(b) in                
          petitioners’ answering brief.                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008