- 10 - makes of premiums for an accident or health insurance policy covering an employee. Sec. 1.106-1, Income Tax Regs. The record establishes that Mr. Eyler paid $5,066 of premi- ums for Mr. Eyler’s Wellmark health policy. However, petitioners have failed to produce evidence, let alone credible evidence, see sec. 7491(a)(1), such as business records or canceled checks drawn on a business checking account of Mr. Eyler, that estab- lishes (1) that Mr. Eyler paid those premiums in his capacity as Ms. Eyler’s employer pursuant to the unwritten health plan and (2) that he did not pay those premiums in his individual capacity as the applicant for, and the primary insured under, Mr. Eyler’s Wellmark health policy.13 On the record before us, we find that petitioners have failed to carry their burden of establishing that Mr. Eyler, as Ms. Eyler’s employer, paid, directly or indirectly, to Ms. Eyler pursuant to the unwritten health plan the claimed $5,066 of health insurance premiums in order to reimburse her for expenses incurred or paid for the medical care of her spouse and 13The parties stipulated that “Audrey Eyler’s salary plus benefits is reasonable compensation for the work she performed.” However, the parties have not stipulated, and the record does not otherwise establish, the “benefits” to which the parties are referring. We have found that petitioners have failed to carry their burden of showing that Mr. Eyler paid the premiums for Mr. Eyler’s Wellmark health policy in his capacity as Ms. Eyler’s employer pursuant to the unwritten health plan.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008