- 6 - During November 2006, petitioner filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The motion states that petitioner’s gross income does not include any amounts attributable to the related items.4 Respondent opposes the motion. Discussion Summary judgment is appropriate with respect to all or any part of the legal issues in controversy “if the pleadings, answers to interrogatories, depositions, admissions, and any other acceptable materials, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that a decision may be rendered as a matter of law.” Rule 121(b); Sundstrand Corp. v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. 518, 520 (1992), affd. 17 F.3d 965 (7th Cir. 1994). The moving party bears the burden of proving that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and factual inferences will be read in a manner most favorable to the party opposing summary judgment. Dahlstrom v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 812, 821 (1985). Petitioner advances two arguments in support of his motion. Petitioner’s first contention is that because he did not receive cash or other property when he allegedly became obligated for the related items, he was not enriched by the forgiveness of the 4 Petitioner also contends that he did not realize discharge of indebtedness income with respect to the principal amount of the loan; however, petitioner does not seek summary judgment with respect to that amount.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007