- 9 - time specified in the note. Consequently, petitioner incurred a liability for the related items. When petitioner was released from the liability, he realized an accession to income due to the freeing of assets previously offset by the liability. See Jelle v. Commissioner, supra at 67. Petitioner nevertheless urges a contrary result, relying primarily on Commissioner v. Rail Joint Co., 61 F.2d 751 (2d Cir. 1932), affg. 22 B.T.A. 1277 (1931); Fashion Park, Inc. v. Commissioner, 21 T.C. 600 (1954); and Bradford v. Commissioner, 233 F.2d 935 (6th Cir. 1956), revg. 22 T.C. 1057 (1954). Those cases are distinguishable. Rail Joint Co. and Fashion Park, Inc. each involved a corporate taxpayer that had issued bonds and later repurchased them for less than par (i.e., face) value. The Commissioner determined that each taxpayer had realized discharge of indebtedness income equal to the difference between the repurchase price of the bonds and their par value. Commissioner v. Rail Joint Co., supra at 751; Fashion Park, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra at 600. The court in each case held that the taxpayer had not realized income. In Commissioner v. Rail Joint Co., supra at 752, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reasoned that the taxpayer “never received any increment to its assets * * * at the time * * * [the bonds] were retired.” In Fashion Park, Inc.Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007