- 26 - petitioners and their family or because petitioners failed to provide the required substantiation. Petitioners argue that respondent has refused to recognize the separate existence of Flair Racing as a business entity. Petitioners point out that both Flair Enterprises and Flair Racing are S corporations, and all income and deductions flow through to petitioners. However, respondent’s disallowance of the disputed deductions is founded upon the determination that Flair Racing was not actively conducting business operations during the years in issue and upon general tax law principles defining the limits of deductible business expenses. The parties agree that Flair Racing was incorporated to shield petitioners and Flair Enterprises from liability associated with the Legends race cars. However, petitioners presented no evidence of any business activities in which Flair Racing engaged during the years in issue. Petitioner testified that the Legends race cars were an enjoyable hobby for himself and his sons. No racing activities occurred during the years in issue, and the Legends race cars were not publicly displayed anywhere outside of the Flair Body Works locations. We are not convinced that Flair Racing was carrying on business during the years in issue. Funds deposited in Flair Racing’s bank account and included as income on Flair Racing’s Federal income tax returns consistedPage: Previous 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007