Lee F. Haney, Sr., and Jean C. Haney, a.k.a. Jeanie Haney - Page 31




                                       - 31 -                                         
          92 (1970).  Fraud may, however, be proved by circumstantial                 
          evidence and inferences drawn from the facts because direct proof           
          of a taxpayer’s intent is rarely available.  Niedringhaus v.                
          Commissioner, 99 T.C. 202, 210 (1992).  The taxpayer’s entire               
          course of conduct may establish the requisite fraudulent intent.            
          Stone v. Commissioner, 56 T.C. 213, 223-224 (1971).  Fraudulent             
          intent may be inferred from various kinds of circumstantial                 
          evidence, or “badges of fraud”, including the consistent                    
          understatement of income, inadequate records, implausible or                
          inconsistent explanations of behavior, concealing assets, and               
          failure to cooperate with tax authorities.  Bradford v.                     
          Commissioner, 796 F.2d 303, 307 (9th Cir. 1986), affg. T.C. Memo.           
          1984-601.  Dealing in cash is also considered a “badge of fraud”            
          by the courts because it is indicative of a taxpayer’s attempt to           
          avoid scrutiny of his finances.  See id. at 308.  Additional                
          “badges of fraud” include keeping a double set of books and                 
          handling one’s affairs to avoid making the records usually made             
          in transactions of the kind.  Spies v. United States, 317 U.S.              
          492, 499 (1943).  Evidence of fraud also includes a taxpayer’s              
          use of a business entity to cloak the personal nature of                    
          expenses.  See Romer v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-168.                  
               For the reasons stated above, respondent’s burden regarding            
          the underpayment of tax in support of the fraud penalty has been            
          met.  Petitioners’ consistent failure to report taxable income              







Page:  Previous  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007