- 4 - that petitioner was liable for self-employment tax on the nonemployee compensation, was liable for additional tax under section 72(t) on the early IRA distribution, and was entitled to a self-employment tax deduction. Respondent also determined that petitioner was liable for additions to tax under sections 6651(a)(1) and (2) and 6654. On December 24, 2003, petitioner’s imperfect petition was filed. By order dated January 5, 2004, we ordered petitioner to file a proper amended petition and pay the filing fee on or before February 19, 2004. No response to the Court’s order was received, and on April 26, 2004, we dismissed petitioner’s case for lack of jurisdiction. On July 29, 2004, we received and filed petitioner’s motion for leave to file a motion to vacate the dismissal order out of time and lodged his motion to vacate the order of dismissal.3 We also received petitioner’s motion for leave to file an amended petition out of time and petitioner’s amended petition. By order dated August 16, 2004, we granted petitioner’s motion for leave to file the motion to vacate, directed that the motion to vacate be filed on that date, granted the motion to vacate, and vacated our April 26, 2004, order of dismissal. In the August 16, 2004, 3Petitioner’s motion for leave to file a motion to vacate the dismissal order was mailed to the Court in an envelope bearing a postmark of July 26, 2004, and was therefore timely filed. See Stewart v. Commissioner, 127 T.C. 109, 116-117 (2006).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011