Raymond A. Heers - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          that petitioner was liable for self-employment tax on the                   
          nonemployee compensation, was liable for additional tax under               
          section 72(t) on the early IRA distribution, and was entitled to            
          a self-employment tax deduction.  Respondent also determined that           
          petitioner was liable for additions to tax under sections                   
          6651(a)(1) and (2) and 6654.                                                
               On December 24, 2003, petitioner’s imperfect petition was              
          filed.  By order dated January 5, 2004, we ordered petitioner to            
          file a proper amended petition and pay the filing fee on or                 
          before February 19, 2004.  No response to the Court’s order was             
          received, and on April 26, 2004, we dismissed petitioner’s case             
          for lack of jurisdiction.                                                   
               On July 29, 2004, we received and filed petitioner’s motion            
          for leave to file a motion to vacate the dismissal order out of             
          time and lodged his motion to vacate the order of dismissal.3  We           
          also received petitioner’s motion for leave to file an amended              
          petition out of time and petitioner’s amended petition.  By order           
          dated August 16, 2004, we granted petitioner’s motion for leave             
          to file the motion to vacate, directed that the motion to vacate            
          be filed on that date, granted the motion to vacate, and vacated            
          our April 26, 2004, order of dismissal.  In the August 16, 2004,            

               3Petitioner’s motion for leave to file a motion to vacate              
          the dismissal order was mailed to the Court in an envelope                  
          bearing a postmark of July 26, 2004, and was therefore timely               
          filed.  See Stewart v. Commissioner, 127 T.C. 109, 116-117                  
          (2006).                                                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011