- 10 - petitioner paid no Federal income tax in 2003 and provided no documentation regarding State taxes. Regarding the possible future increases in expenses outlined in petitioner’s letter explaining the offer amount, respondent determined that these were “general projections from the taxpayers’ representative and may never, in fact, be incurred” and thus did not take them into account. After making adjustments to petitioner’s monthly expenses, respondent determined that $28,815 was collectible from petitioner’s future income.8 Respondent concluded that petitioner had the ability to pay $456,881. Because petitioner had the ability to pay substantially more than the amount offered, respondent rejected his offer-in- compromise based on doubt as to collectibility with special circumstances. Respondent also rejected petitioner’s effective tax administration offer-in-compromise because he did not have the ability to pay his outstanding tax liability in full. Respondent concluded that petitioner did not offer an acceptable collection alternative, that all requirements of law and administrative procedure had been met, and that respondent could proceed with the proposed collection action. 8 Respondent determined that petitioner had monthly disposable income of $339 and multiplied this by 85, the number of months remaining on the collection statute.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011