Rhonda K. Juell, a.k.a. Rhonda K. Juell-Podlak, Petitioner, and Glenn M. Evans - Page 12




                                       - 12 -                                         
          nominally held between the spouses but also to each spouse’s                
          level of participation in the activity which gave rise to the               
          erroneous item.                                                             
               Joint ownership, by itself, is not determinative of whether            
          the erroneous item is attributable to one or both spouses.  See             
          Rowe v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-325; Buchine v.                       
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-36, affd. 20 F.3d 173 (5th Cir.               
          1994).  A key factor is whether and to what extent the electing             
          spouse voluntarily participated in the investment which gave rise           
          to the erroneous item.                                                      
               Generally, an electing spouse who voluntarily agrees to                
          enter into an investment and who actively participates in it is             
          precluded from attributing the entire investment to the                     
          nonelecting spouse.  See Abelein v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.                
          2004-274; Capehart v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-268, affd.              
          204 Fed. Appx. 618 (9th Cir. 2006); Bartak v. Commissioner, T.C.            
          Memo. 2004-83, affd. 158 Fed. Appx. 43 (9th Cir. 2005); Ellison             
          v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-57; Doyel v. Commissioner, T.C.            
          Memo. 2004-35.                                                              
               However, if the electing spouse is not an active                       
          participant, the electing spouse may qualify for relief even                
          though being named as a shareholder or partner.  See McKnight v.            
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2006-155 (in the context of section                









Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007