Estate of Burton W. Kanter, Deceased, Joshua S. Kanter, Executor, and Naomi R. Kanter, et al. - Page 129

                                                -208-                                                   
            wealthy investors to Frey’s projects not involving Prudential                               
            properties.                                                                                 
                  During 1982 through 1989, Essex Partnership made payments to                          
            THC totaling $645,009 representing cash distributions on THC’s                              
            partnership interest.  These payments served to compensate Kanter                           
            for obtaining hotel management contracts for MHM.                                           
                  F.  Distribution of Funds From THC to Kanter                                          
                  The payments THC received from Schaffel, Frey, and Essex                              
            Partnership during the years at issue generally were deposited                              
            into THC’s bank account.  Petitioners’ Reply Brief at 646.                                  
                  During 1983, THC transferred $2,335,298 from its account to                           
            TACI’s accounts.  Exhs. 148, 149, 174; Petitioners’ Reply Brief                             
            at 646.100  These transfers were identified in THC’s general                                
            ledgers as investments, loans, or repayments of loans.                                      
            Petitioners’ Reply Brief at 647.  During 1983, $1,339,843 was                               
            transferred from TACI’s accounts back to THC identified as                                  
            returns on THC’s investments, loans from TACI, and repayments of                            
            earlier loans from THC to TACI.  Exh. 5406, Petitioners’ Reply                              








                  100  See app. 7 to this report.                                                       





Page:  Previous  198  199  200  201  202  203  204  205  206  207  208  209  210  211  212  213  214  215  216  217  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011