-217- documents after receipt of the IRS summons. United States v. Administration Co., supra; Exh. 9047--Mem. Op. and Ord. of May 20, 1994. The District Court concluded that none of the summoned documents were produced and the Kanters and the four Kanter- related entities acted in bad faith in failing to comply with and blocking enforcement of the summonses. The District Court ordered Gallenberger, on behalf of PSAC, to appear before the IRS by May 24, 1994, and produce the records sought by the summonses. United States v. Administration Co., supra; Exh. 9047--Mem. Op. and Ord. of May 20, 1994. Although Gallenberger appeared before the IRS and testified and produced some documents on May 24, 1994, she did not search all of the records in her possession but instead looked in every fifth, sixth, or seventh file. On June 10, 1994, the Government filed with the District Court a motion to hold Gallenberger in contempt. On June 22, 1994, the District Court held a further hearing. The District Court noted that PSAC operated much like a registered agent and a document repository primarily for the benefit of Kanter-related entities, and most of PSAC’s over 2000 files related to Kanter. United States v. Administration Co., 74 AFTR 2d 94-5256, 94-2 USTC par. 50,480 (N.D. Ill. 1994), affd. 46Page: Previous 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011