Estate of Burton W. Kanter, Deceased, Joshua S. Kanter, Executor, and Naomi R. Kanter, et al. - Page 213

                                                -284-                                                   
            purportedly arranged in December 1986 to repay the $160,000 loan                            
            to Mary Ballard with Macy’s preferred stock, TMT’s accounting                               
            records do not indicate that the $160,000 loan was ever repaid.                             
                  In 1986, TMT paid $100,000 for an asset described in TMT’s                            
            general ledger as “LAND ST. FRANCIS COUNTY [ARKANSAS] 414.28                                
            ACRE”.121  This asset was subsequently removed from TMT’s general                           
            ledger, and adjusting journal entries indicated that an asset                               
            identified as “Fairfield Planting Company” was transferred to                               
            Ballard, and Ballard’s loans from TMT were increased by $100,000.                           
                  When Gallenberger was questioned about this transaction, she                          
            could not recall the details and suggested Ballard should be                                
            questioned on the matter.  Ballard testified that (1) the                                   
            transaction involved his acquisition of stock in Fairfield                                  
            Planting Co., an S corporation involved in farm operations in                               
            Arkansas; (2) he owed TMT approximately $200,000 on the                                     
            transaction; (3) TMT continued to receive “interest” on the deal;                           
            (4) he owned two-sevenths of Fairfield; (5) the initial Fairfield                           
            investment was $1,350,000, and the investment had increased in                              
            value to approximately $2,350,000; and (6) the Fairfield                                    
            transaction was a good deal for TMT and a bad deal for him.                                 




                  121  TMT’s general ledger also reflected a separate                                   
            transaction involving what appears to be another property in St.                            
            Francis County identified as land ($424,800), along with a                                  
            building ($25,200) and building improvements ($10,925).                                     





Page:  Previous  274  275  276  277  278  279  280  281  282  283  284  285  286  287  288  289  290  291  292  293  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011