Estate of Burton W. Kanter, Deceased, Joshua S. Kanter, Executor, and Naomi R. Kanter, et al. - Page 259

                                                -326-                                                   
                  1  The $12,711 amount listed in the STJ report is erroneous.                          
            See Exh. 9123.                                                                              
                  Hi-Chicago Trust, on its income tax returns for fiscal years                          
            ending February 28, 1981, through February 28, 1984, claimed                                
            deductions with respect to the above payments to THC.  On the                               
            trust’s return for fiscal year ending February 28, 1981, the                                
            payment to THC was characterized as “fiduciary fees”.  On the                               
            trust’s return for the fiscal year ending February 28, 1982, the                            
            payments to THC were characterized as “participation fees”.  On                             
            the trust’s returns for its fiscal years ending February 28,                                
            1983, and February 28, 1984, the payments to THC were claimed,                              
            respectively, as “commissions” and “commissions expenses”.  The                             
            trust claimed no deductions for fiduciary fees on its 1982, 1983,                           
            and 1984 fiscal year returns.  Kanter, as the trust’s trustee,                              
            signed the trust’s 1981, 1982, 1983, and 1984 fiscal year                                   
            returns.                                                                                    
                                               OPINION                                                  
            A.  The Assignment of Income Doctrine                                                       
            In United States v. Basye, 410 U.S. at 450, the Supreme                                     
            Court reiterated the longstanding principle that income is taxed                            
            to the person who earns it, stating:  “The principle of Lucas v.                            
            Earl [281 U.S. at 115], that he who earns income may not avoid                              
            taxation through anticipatory arrangements no matter how clever                             
            or subtle, has been repeatedly invoked by this Court and stands                             





Page:  Previous  316  317  318  319  320  321  322  323  324  325  326  327  328  329  330  331  332  333  334  335  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011