-326- 1 The $12,711 amount listed in the STJ report is erroneous. See Exh. 9123. Hi-Chicago Trust, on its income tax returns for fiscal years ending February 28, 1981, through February 28, 1984, claimed deductions with respect to the above payments to THC. On the trust’s return for fiscal year ending February 28, 1981, the payment to THC was characterized as “fiduciary fees”. On the trust’s return for the fiscal year ending February 28, 1982, the payments to THC were characterized as “participation fees”. On the trust’s returns for its fiscal years ending February 28, 1983, and February 28, 1984, the payments to THC were claimed, respectively, as “commissions” and “commissions expenses”. The trust claimed no deductions for fiduciary fees on its 1982, 1983, and 1984 fiscal year returns. Kanter, as the trust’s trustee, signed the trust’s 1981, 1982, 1983, and 1984 fiscal year returns. OPINION A. The Assignment of Income Doctrine In United States v. Basye, 410 U.S. at 450, the Supreme Court reiterated the longstanding principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, stating: “The principle of Lucas v. Earl [281 U.S. at 115], that he who earns income may not avoid taxation through anticipatory arrangements no matter how clever or subtle, has been repeatedly invoked by this Court and standsPage: Previous 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011