Estate of Burton W. Kanter, Deceased, Joshua S. Kanter, Executor, and Naomi R. Kanter, et al. - Page 266

                                                -332-                                                   
                  As of January 1, 1987, the Bea Ritch Trusts possessed                                 
            substantial assets and financial net worth.  Since their                                    
            inception, each of the 25 trusts filed Federal income tax returns                           
            for the fiscal year ending September 30.  On their returns                                  
            covering the period 1969 to 1986, the trusts, collectively,                                 
            reported substantial income, deductions, and losses from numerous                           
            investments.  These investments included the trusts’ ownership of                           
            all of IRA’s outstanding stock, their ownership of substantial                              
            stock interests in THC, and their acquisition in 1973 of a                                  
            collective 18-percent interest in the Oyster Bay Associates                                 
            Partnership that invested in a cable television venture.                                    
            B.  Oyster Bay Associates Partnership                                                       
                  Prior to the 1970s, Kanter initiated a practice at his law                            
            firm, Levenfeld and Kanter (Levenfeld/Kanter), under which the                              
            law firm’s partners, their family members, and/or their family                              
            entities were offered the opportunity to participate in various                             
            investment opportunities that came to the attention of Kanter and                           
            other members of the firm.  Participation in these investments                              
            was on a voluntary and individual basis.  A partner (or that                                
            partner’s family members or family entities) was allowed to                                 
            subscribe to, and obtain a maximum percentage ownership interest                            
            in, the investment equal to that partner’s law firm partnership                             
            percentage interest.  In the event any partner decided either (1)                           
            not to participate, or (2) not to invest up to the initial                                  




Page:  Previous  322  323  324  325  326  327  328  329  330  331  332  333  334  335  336  337  338  339  340  341  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011