- 3 -
Petitioner filed a response to respondent’s motion (peti-
tioner’s response) in which petitioner stated in pertinent part:
1. Petitioner has moved into negotiations for settle-
ment through the IRS appeals office * * *
2. Petitioner is currently collecting information and
documents to form a settlement and believes that
it will be possible to resolve the case without
the necessity of a trial.
* * * * * * *
4. Petitioner requests the court grant time for the
disputing parties to come to an agreement by stay-
ing the motion for judgment on the pleadings by an
amount of time deemed appropriate by the court.
Respondent filed a reply to petitioner’s response in which
respondent stated in pertinent part:
5. On March 1, 2007, respondent's counsel con-
tacted appeals office to determine the status of this
case which is currently under appeals jurisdiction.
6. The appeals officer assigned to this case
indicated that he spoke with petitioner regarding the
issues in this case on March 1, 2007. Petitioner does
not contest that he received wage income in the amount
of $34,104.00 from California Food Plan, Inc., however
he now alleges that he is entitled to a Schedule A
deduction for unreimbursed employee expenses.
7. Petitioner further indicated that he would
provide a memorandum outlining his claimed expenses to
respondent’s appeals office during the week of March 5,
2007.
8. On March 8, 2007, respondent’s appeals offi-
cer informed the undersigned that petitioner has not
provided any information and/or documentary evidence to
support his alleged Schedule A deduction for
unreimbursed employee expenses in taxable year 2003.
[Reproduced literally.]
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 10, 2007