Nicolas Charles Karkabe - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
                                     Discussion                                       
               The Court may grant judgment on the pleadings where the                
          pleadings do not raise a genuine issue of material fact and a               
          decision may be rendered as a matter of law.  Rule 120(a); Nis              
          Family Trust v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 523, 537 (2000).  “A                 
          judgment on the pleadings is a judgment based solely on the                 
          allegations and information contained in the pleadings and not on           
          any outside matters.  See Rule 120(a) and (b)”.  Nis Family Trust           
          v. Commissioner, supra at 537.                                              
               Rule 34(b) provides in pertinent part that a petition with             
          respect to a notice of deficiency is to contain:                            
                    (4)  Clear and concise assignments of each and                    
               every error which the petitioner alleges to have been                  
               committed by the Commissioner in the determination of                  
               the deficiency * * * Any issue not raised in the as-                   
               signments of error shall be deemed to be conceded.                     
               * * *                                                                  
                    (5)  Clear and concise lettered statements of the                 
               facts on which the petitioner bases the assignments of                 
               error * * *                                                            
               The petition in the instant case does not contain (1) a                
          clear and concise statement of the errors allegedly committed by            
          respondent in determining the deficiency in, and the accuracy-              
          related penalty under section 6662(a) on, petitioner’s tax for              
          his taxable year 2003 and (2) a clear and concise statement of              
          the facts that form the basis of petitioner’s assignment of                 
          alleged error.  We find that the petition does not comply with              
          the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure as to the form and            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007