Gary W. McDonough - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          Petitioner petitioned the Court on August 23, 2004, to                      
          redetermine that determination.                                             
               On November 5, 2004, respondent filed with the Court an                
          answer to petitioner’s petition.  The answer alleges that in lieu           
          of the determined amounts, petitioner is liable for a $3,029.60             
          accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(h) for 1989 and a               
          $5,664.80 accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) for                
          1991.  On April 18, 2006, respondent amended his answer to allege           
          as an alternative to the accuracy-related penalty under section             
          6662(h) for 1989 that petitioner is liable for a $1,514.80                  
          accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) for negligence or            
          disregard of rules or regulations, see sec. 6662(b)(1), and/or              
          for substantial understatement of income tax, see sec.                      
          6662(b)(2).                                                                 
               We decide whether petitioner is liable for the disputed                
          accuracy-related penalties.  We hold that petitioner is liable              
          for a section 6662(h) accuracy-related penalty for 1989 and a               
          section 6662(a) accuracy-related penalty for 1991, both in the              
          amounts alleged by respondent in his answer.4                               


               4 At the outset, we note that three Courts of Appeals have             
          affirmed prior decisions of this Court holding that other                   
          investors in Hoyt partnerships were liable for accuracy-related             
          penalties for negligence under sec. 6662(a) and (b)(1).  See                
          Hansen v. Commissioner, 471 F.3d 1021 (9th Cir. 2006), affg. T.C.           
          Memo. 2004-269; Mortensen v. Commissioner, 440 F.3d 375 (6th Cir.           
          2006), affg. T.C. Memo. 2004-279; Van Scoten v. Commissioner,               
          439 F.3d 1243 (10th Cir. 2006), affg. T.C. Memo. 2004-275.                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007