William F. Middleton - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
               On May 1, 2004, respondent mailed petitioner a Final Notice            
          of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing (notice             
          of levy), with respect to 1991.  On May 9, 2004, petitioner                 
          submitted Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process                  
          Hearing.  In his request, petitioner stated he disagreed with the           
          amount of the tax liability and his attorney, Randall Bailey (Mr.           
          Bailey), was prepared to negotiate an offer in compromise.                  
               On May 21, 2004, respondent mailed a letter in response to             
          petitioner’s request for an administrative hearing, in which                
          respondent stated:  “Thank you for your inquiry dated May 9,                
          2004.  We are investigating and will reply by Aug. 25, 2004”.  On           
          July 14, 2004, respondent mailed another letter to petitioner               
          informing him that respondent’s Appeals Office would notify him             
          of the date and time of his administrative hearing.                         
               On December 21, 2004, respondent’s Appeals Office mailed               
          petitioner and Mr. Bailey the notice of determination sustaining            
          the notice of levy.  In the notice of determination, Settlement             
          Officer Karen O’Neal found:                                                 
               In our letter dated September 10, 2004, and our follow-                
               up letters dated October 28, 2004 and November 17,                     
               2004, we asked you to contact us to schedule your                      
               Collection Due Process hearing.  Since you did not                     
               contact our office, you offered no alternative to the                  
               proposed collection action.  Therefore, we made our                    
               decision based upon the information in your case file                  
               and computer transcripts of your account history.                      









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007