William F. Middleton - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
          determination for abuse of discretion.  Sego v. Commissioner, 114           
          T.C. 604, 610 (2000); Goza v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 176, 181               
          (2000).  The abuse of discretion standard requires the Court to             
          decide whether the Commissioner’s determination was arbitrary,              
          capricious, or without sound basis in fact or law.  Woodral v.              
          Commissioner, 112 T.C. 19, 23 (1999); Keller v. Commissioner,               
          T.C. Memo. 2006-166; Fowler v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-163.           
               Petitioner contends he was not given an opportunity for an             
          administrative hearing pursuant to section 6330(b).  Generally,             
          if a taxpayer requests an administrative hearing, the hearing               
          will be held with the Commissioner’s Appeals Office.  Sec.                  
          6330(b); sec. 301.6330-1(d)(1), Proced. & Admin. Regs.  An                  
          administrative hearing will be conducted by an employee or                  
          officer of Appeals who, before the first hearing under section              
          6320 or section 6330, had no involvement with respect to the tax            
          for the tax period to be covered by the hearing, unless the                 
          taxpayer waives this requirement.  Sec. 6330(b)(3).  An                     
          administrative hearing may, but is not required to, consist of a            
          face-to-face meeting, one or more written or oral communications            
          between an Appeals officer or employee and the taxpayer or the              
          taxpayer’s representative, or some combination thereof.  Sec.               
          301.6330-1(d)(2), A-D6, Proced. & Admin. Regs.                              
               In determining whether petitioner received an administrative           
          hearing, the Court considers section 301.6330-1(d)(2), A-D7,                







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007