Barry E. Moore and Deborah E. Moore - Page 32




                                       - 32 -                                         
          confirming his agreement to give Ms. Moore “10% of the net                  
          proceeds upon the sale of * * * [the LLC]”, but, petitioners                
          argue, not an additional 10-percent share of annual income, (3)             
          the fact that the Schedules K-1 attached to the 1997-2000 LLC               
          partnership returns all state that the three members share LLC              
          profits and losses in a ratio of 88 percent for Dr. Joffe, 10               
          percent for Dr. McKernan, and 2 percent for Ms. Moore, (4) the              
          Kelly correspondence, in which Mr. Kelly expressed his                      
          understanding, presumably obtained from the Moore letter and,               
          perhaps, from other conversations or communications with Ms.                
          Moore, that the foregoing 88-10-2-percent LLC ownership split was           
          still in effect, (5) the LLC members’ failure to satisfy the                
          requirements of the LLC operating agreement governing                       
          dispositions of membership interests, and (6) the SouthTrust Bank           
          credit report, which, petitioners allege, indicates that, as late           
          as December 1, 1998, SouthTrust Bank believed that Dr. Joffe                
          still owned 88 percent of the LLC.  Petitioners state:  “The                
          documentary evidence of the bank loan * * * confirms that * * *             
          [Dr. Joffe] pledged * * * [his 88 percent] membership interest to           
          SouthTrust Bank in March 1999, [the date of the loan] over two              
          years after respondent claims he transferred 10% of that interest           
          [to Ms. Moore].”                                                            
               Petitioners view the language in the assignment and                    
          assumption agreement creating an effective date “as of” January             







Page:  Previous  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007