Barry E. Moore and Deborah E. Moore - Page 34




                                       - 34 -                                         
          agreement, an action that amounted to their consent to the waiver           
          of those requirements.   He argues that the assignment and                  
          assumption agreement was not “backdated”, i.e., it “was not a               
          document * * * [attempting] to change the past or * * * to                  
          misrepresent the past”, but, rather, “was * * * created to                  
          formalize informal transactions that had occurred in the past”.             
          He also argues that the effective date provision is not an                  
          example of mutual mistake that would otherwise permit petitioners           
          to introduce parol evidence to establish the actual effective               
          date of Dr. Joffe’s transfer of a 10-percent interest in the LLC            
          to Ms. Moore; and he argues that the LLC’s 1998-2000 increased              
          distributions to Dr. McKernan and Ms. Moore were not simply a               
          monetary quid pro quo for the use of LLC assets as collateral for           
          the discharge of Dr. Joffe’s bank debt related to his failed                
          Cincinnati Surgery Center.  Rather, he argues that those                    
          distributions corroborated a prior increase in the LLC membership           
          interests of those individuals.                                             
               D.  Analysis                                                           
                    1.  Introduction                                                  
               Although each party can point to evidence supporting that              
          party’s view regarding the date upon which Ms. Moore’s membership           
          interest in the LLC increased from 2 percent to 12 percent, we              
          find that a preponderance of the evidence supports respondent’s             








Page:  Previous  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007