Antonio O. Neal - Page 7




                                        - 6 -                                         
          Filing of Petitioner’s 2003 Federal Income Tax Return                       
               Petitioner’s Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return,             
          was prepared and electronically filed by H&R Block Tax Services             
          located in Gurnee, Illinois.  Petitioner filed his return as head           
          of household and claimed two children as dependents, the earned             
          income credit, and the additional child tax credit.  In the                 
          notice of deficiency, respondent determined that petitioner’s               
          filing status was married filing separately and disallowed the              
          two claimed dependency exemption deductions, the earned income              
          credit, and the additional child tax credit.  The tax return                
          preparer prepared petitioner’s return based on information that             
          petitioner provided.  Petitioner’s 2003 return was filed on April           
          6, 2004.                                                                    
                                     Discussion                                       
               In general, respondent’s determinations as set forth in a              
          notice of deficiency are presumed correct.  Welch v. Helvering,             
          290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).  In pertinent part, Rule 142(a)(1)                
          provides the general rule that the burden of proof shall be upon            
          the taxpayer.  In certain circumstances, however, if the taxpayer           
          introduces credible evidence with respect to any factual issue              
          relevant to ascertaining the proper tax liability, section 7491             
          shifts the burden of proof to the Commissioner.  Sec. 7491(a)(1);           
          Rule 142(a)(2).  Petitioner does not argue that section 7491 is             
          applicable in this case, and he has not established that the                







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008