- 7 - Respondent subsequently amended his answer, without objection from petitioner, to allege actual knowledge of the items giving rise to the deficiencies for the years in issue. Discussion Generally, married taxpayers may elect to file a joint Federal income tax return. Sec. 6013(a). After making the election, each spouse is jointly and severally liable for the entire tax due. Sec. 6013(d)(3). Section 6015 provides, however, that a spouse may seek relief from joint and several liability on a joint return under certain circumstances. A spouse (requesting spouse) may seek relief from joint and several liability under section 6015(b), or if eligible, may allocate liability according to section 6015(c). If relief is not available under section 6015(b) or (c), the requesting spouse may seek equitable relief under section 6015(f). Sec. 6015(f)(2); Butler v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 276, 287-292 (2000). Petitioner claims that she is entitled to relief from joint and several liability under section 6015(c) for 1995, 1996, and 1997. Respondent argues that petitioner’s claim for relief under section 6015(c) with respect to 1995 and 1996 is barred by the doctrine of res judicata by operation of section 6015(g)(2). Respondent contends that section 6015(g)(2) applies because: (1) The Court entered a final decision for 1995 and 1996 in the prior proceeding; (2) petitioner participated meaningfully in the priorPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007