Peno Trucking, Incorporated - Page 16




                                       - 16 -                                         
          this factor was self-serving and unreliable.  This factor                   
          indicates an employee-employer relationship.                                
               E. Integral Part of Business                                           
               The drivers performed a service essential to petitioner’s              
          operation.  The success of petitioner’s business depended, in               
          large part, upon the service performed by the drivers.  Thus, the           
          drivers were an integral part of petitioner’s business.  This               
          factor supports an employer-employee relationship.  See Day v.              
          Commissioner, supra.                                                        
               F.   Permanency of the Relationship                                    
               A transitory work relationship may point toward a                      
          nonemployee status.  Ewens & Miller, Inc. v. Commissioner, 117              
          T.C. at 273.  If, however, a person works in the course of the              
          employers’ trade or business, the fact that he does not work                
          regularly may be insignificant.  Id.                                        
               The drivers worked in the course of petitioner’s business              
          rather than having a transitory relationship with petitioner.               
          This factor supports an employer-employee relationship.  See id.            
               G.   Relationship the Parties Thought They Created                     
               Petitioner and its drivers entered into written agreements             
          which expressly provided that the drivers were independent                  
          contractors.  However, our findings with respect to the degree of           
          control exercised by petitioner, petitioner’s investment in the             
          trucks, the drivers’ lack of assumption of risk, the ability to             







Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007