- 4 -
an OIC to resolve his outstanding tax liabilities. On the same
date as his motion for continuance, respondent filed a motion for
remand. Both motions were granted by the Court.
Respondent’s status report, filed March 7, 2005, reported
that as of the date of the report, no OIC had been submitted to
respondent. Attached to the report is a copy of a letter from
petitioner to respondent in which petitioner suggests that “it
would be better to include the 2004 year in the offer” and
asking: “Can you give me some more time?”. Respondent’s status
report requested an additional 30 days to “settle” the case. By
Order dated April 8, 2005, the Court granted an additional 30
days for the parties to discuss settlement. The Order also
required the filing of a status report on or before April 29,
2005, specifically stating whether petitioner had yet submitted
an OIC.
Petitioner sent to the Court a letter dated April 21, 2005,
in which he stated that “I am still gathering information to
finish my 2004 filings.” Respondent’s status report received and
filed May 4, 2005, reported: (a) Petitioner’s representative
sent to the Appeals officer considering petitioner’s case an
electronic facsimile of Form 656 that did not include Form 433-A;
(b) as of the date of the report, no signed original Form 656 had
been submitted; and (c) no Federal income tax return for 2004 had
been filed. Respondent once again requested an additional 30
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011