Marc Perkel - Page 6

                                        - 5 -                                         
          days in which to attempt to settle the case.  The Court on May 5,           
          2005, granted respondent’s request and ordered the parties to               
          file status reports by May 31, 2005.                                        
               The Court on May 10, 2005, received petitioner’s letter                
          dated April 28, 2005, in which he stated:  “On April 14th I was             
          rushed to file a crudely and quickly assembled offer in                     
          compromise in which I offered $15,000 to settle the outstanding             
          debt.”  According to petitioner’s letter, he was still “in the              
          process” of filing his Federal income tax return for 2004.                  
          Another letter was received by the Court from petitioner on May             
          24, 2005, in which he alleged that he had filed his 2004 income             
          tax return, completed all the forms for his OIC, and had paid his           
          filing fee for the OIC.                                                     
               Prior to the Court’s receipt of those letters, respondent              
          issued on May 5, 2005, a Supplemental Notice Of Determination               
          Concerning Collection Action(s) Under Section 6320 and/or 6330              
          sustaining respondent’s collection action.                                  
               In respondent’s status report to the Court dated May 31,               
          2005, respondent acknowledges receiving, on or about May 20,                
          2005, an OIC package from petitioner with supporting                        
          documentation and a $150 processing fee.  Respondent’s report               
          requested guidance from the Court on how to proceed.                        
               By Order dated June 2, 2005, the Court restored the case to            
          the general docket for trial or other disposition.  The case was            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011