Gilda A. Petrane - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
               (e.g., deficiency cases, section 6015(e) spousal relief                
               cases, or section 6330 collection proceedings).                        
          Schwartz involved a section 6330 collection proceeding where the            
          election to proceed as a small tax case was governed by section             
          7463(f)(2).  The instant case involves a section 6015(e) spousal            
          relief proceeding where the election to proceed as a small tax              
          case is governed by section 7463(f)(1).  Therefore, we must                 
          analyze the distinct language in section 7463(f)(1) applicable to           
          section 6015(e) spousal relief cases.                                       
               Section 7463(f) provides:                                              
                    SEC. 7463(f).  Additional Cases in Which                          
               Proceedings May Be Conducted Under This Section.–-At                   
               the option of the taxpayer concurred in by the Tax                     
               Court or a division thereof before the hearing of the                  
               case, proceedings may be conducted under this section                  
               (in the same manner as a case described in subsection                  
               (a)) in the case of--                                                  
                         (1) a petition to the Tax Court under                        
                    section 6015(e) in which the amount of relief                     
                    sought does not exceed $50,000, and                               
                         (2) an appeal under section                                  
                    6330(d)(1)(A) to the Tax Court of a                               
                    determination in which the unpaid tax does                        
                    not exceed $50,000.  [Emphasis added.]                            
               In interpreting a statute, our purpose is to give effect to            
          Congress’s intent.  Fernandez v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 324, 329            
          (2000); see also Gati v. Commissioner, 113 T.C. 132, 133 (1999).            
          We begin with the statutory language.  Allen v. Commissioner, 118           
          T.C. 1, 7 (2002) (and cases cited thereat).  Usually, the plain             
          meaning of the statutory language is conclusive.  United States             







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007