- 40 - economic substance, and the methods used in preparing the individual and partnership returns. See Transpac Drilling Venture, 1983-2 v. United States, 32 Fed. Cl. at 821 (where the Court of Federal Claims looked at the sham nature of the transaction in its analysis of the 6-year fraud statute set forth in section 6229(c)(1)). During the years at issue, Hoyt’s scheme was to sell tax deductions using phoney partnerships that generated false and fraudulent flowthrough tax deductions. As reflected in our factual findings, the sheep partnership returns filed for the periods 1984, 1987, 1988, and 1989 included the following false or fraudulent items: (1) Depreciation deductions and credits attributable to nonexistent and overvalued sheep, (2) interest deductions for illusory indebtedness relating to nonexistent and overvalued sheep, and (3) false deductions for farm expenses and guaranteed payments. Petitioners not only admitted in their pleadings that the returns signed by Hoyt included false information, but they also repeatedly referred to Hoyt’s fraudulent conduct and deception in their other submissions to the Court. We have examined the structure and workings of Hoyt’s cattle and sheep partnerships in River City Ranches I, Durham Farms #1 v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-159, affd. 59 Fed. Appx. 952 (9th Cir. 2003), and River City Ranches #4, J.V. v. Commissioner,Page: Previous 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007