128 T.C. No. 3 UNITED STATES TAX COURT CYNTHIA L. ROWE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 17856-04. Filed February 22, 2007. P and her two young children lived together in 2002 until her arrest on June 5. P continued to support her children after her arrest until July 2, but P was confined in jail for the rest of the year. P claimed an earned income credit (EIC) on her Federal income tax return for 2002 and received an EIC of $1,070. R then denied the EIC, claiming that P did not have the same principal place of abode as her children for more than half of the year. P argues that, although she was jailed for the rest of 2002 after her arrest on June 5, the home where she lived with her children before her arrest still constituted the principal place of abode for her and her children for all of 2002. Held: P is eligible for the EIC for 2002. P’s absence due to being held in jail after her arrest does not prevent her from qualifying for the EIC.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011