- 11 - has listed 13 broad contentions3 which he believes support his assertion that there has been an abuse of discretion. Petitioner, however, in this shotgunlike approach has not provided meaningful detail or legal support for his contentions, either to respondent or to the Court.4 Petitioner vigorously pursued respondent’s determination of his 1991 income tax deficiency, and he was unsuccessful in this Court and in his Appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Scott v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-507, affd. 182 F.3d 915 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, petitioner may not contest the existence or amount of the underlying tax liability because he received a notice of deficiency, and he had a full opportunity to dispute the underlying tax liability. Sec. 3 The broad contentions include: (1) Appropriateness of collection actions; (2) collection alternatives; (3) impairment of spouse’s rights; (4) amount of tax; (5) amount of interest; (6) amount of penalty; (7) adequacy of notice; (8) due process rights; (9) equal protection rights; (10) other points to be made at hearing; (11) adequacy of Appeals rights; (12) timeliness of notice of lien; and (13) improper filing of lien. 4 Petitioner’s pleading, submissions to respondent, and his legal briefs filed with the Court are terse and contain broad platitudes without meaningful rationale or support in statutes, regulations or case precedent. We do not hold petitioner to a higher standard because of his extensive legal career, but simply note that he had the ability or capacity to provide the Court with legal support, if any exists, for his allegations or assertions.Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007