- 14 - filing of the NFTL. Under section 6320(a), respondent may file the NFTL before notifying petitioner or providing him with a hearing. We note, however, that petitioner did discuss his outstanding liability and the potential for the filing of an NFTL with respondent’s collection officer prior to the filing. As a general matter The right of the United States to collect its internal revenue by summary administrative proceedings has long been settled. Where * * * adequate opportunity is afforded for a later judicial determination of the legal rights, summary proceedings to secure prompt performance of pecuniary obligations to the government have been consistently sustained. [Fn. ref. omitted.] Phillips v. Commissioner, 283 U.S. 589, 595 (1931);6 see also United States v. Natl. Bank of Commerce, 472 U.S. 713 (1985). The statutes we consider provide for prompt notice after the collection action (filing the NFTL) and for a hearing and judicial review. Secs. 6320, 6330. Therefore, petitioner’s contention that there was a lack of due process must fail. Petitioner also contended that respondent did not provide him with a timely notice under section 6320 (sent to his last known address within 5 business days of the NFTL filing), but the record reflects that respondent met the time requirement and 6 We note that petitioner, unlike the taxpayer in Phillips, litigated his liability on the merits before a lien arose and in that sense was afforded a prior judicial determination of his legal rights.Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007