Sam E. Scott - Page 21




                                       - 21 -                                         
         excessive without providing any statutory, regulatory, or case               
         precedent in support of his position.  To the extent that                    
         petitioner was entitled to question the amount of the penalties              
         and interest included in the outstanding 1991 tax liability, he              
         has not provided sufficient information from which we could                  
         conclude that respondent’s assessed amounts are in error.                    
              VI.  Whether There Was Compliance by Respondent With                    
                   Sections 6631 and 6751                                             
              Sections 6631 and 6751, which were enacted as part of the               
         Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998,               
         Pub. L. 105-206, 112 Stat. 685, requires the Secretary to include            
         certain information on any notice to a taxpayer of liability for             
         interest or for a penalty.  Sections 6631 and 6751 were effective            
         for notices sent to taxpayers after December 31, 2000, which date            
         was extended to June 30, 2001, by the Community Renewal Tax                  
         Relief Act of 2000, Pub. L. 106-554, section 302(b) and (c), 114             
         Stat. 2763A-632.  In addition, sections 302(b) and (c) of the                
         Community Renewal Tax Relief Act of 2000 also provided that the              
         requirements of sections 6631 and 6751(a) would be “treated as               
         met” if any notice issued after June 30, 2001, and before July 1,            

              9(...continued)                                                         
          Although petitioner is not barred from contesting whether the               
          interest accumulated on the assessment was correctly computed by            
          respondent, he has not made that argument.  See Urbano v.                   
          Commissioner, 122 T.C. 384, 392-393 (2004).  Petitioner’s                   
          argument here is that accumulated interest on the addition to tax           
          and penalty causes those amounts to exceed the statutorily                  
          prescribed percentages of 25 and 20 percent, respectively.                  





Page:  Previous  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007